Behavior First

October 27, 2009

A Simple Equation for Loyalty Marketing

This economic environment is encouraging marketers to focus on shifting their spend from traditional acquisition marketing to efforts that generate value from their existing customers. The marketing paradigm is clear – it costs significantly less to retain an existing customer versus trying to acquire a new (and reluctant) one.

This issue is leading to many conversations about developing and executing loyalty programs. However, based on the quality of the discussions with companies across multiple categories, I see a significant level of misunderstanding. There is a lack of clarity about the role of loyalty programs as well as the components that make up a successful loyalty program.

Let’s first tackle the role issue. In my opinion, the most important role of a loyalty program is to engage with the brand’s core customer group and learn how it can best serve their needs. Brands need to serve these customers in a completely differentiated manner from its competitive set. Marketing applications are just the tip of the iceberg. The knowledge and insight gained from customer behaviors should be used to improve their experience with the brand. The end result is to have these customers become bonded to the brand. This is the secret of success for Tesco and Harrah’s, arguably the two best loyalty programs in the world today.

However, considering most companies don’t have a decade (Harrah’s) or fifteen years (Tesco) to develop and refine their program, here is a simple formula to help create an effective loyalty program.

2RL + 2RC + RW = Loyalty (Two parts Relevance plus 2 parts Recognition plus one part Reward equals Customer Loyalty.)

Relevance is essentially providing your customers with information and offers about products/services that would be the most appropriate to them based on their past transactional behaviors. For example, I buy my jeans from Old Navy. Don’t ask me why, but they fit me better than any other brand. If they send me offers/communications offering new styles of jeans or sweaters that coordinate with my recent purchases, it is relevant to me. Not necessarily the specific items – adjacent categories are still relevant. Unfortunately, Old Navy does not do this. Instead, I receive emails from them offering me great deals on baby and maternity clothes.

Recognition is about letting the customer know that they are important to you. Best Buy does a good job by recognizing their customer’s business with them. Not only do they provide their customers with additional value, but they also communicate with them in a very personal way. They use the data from their Reward Zone program very effectively to build better relationships.

Reward is the specific offer. While this is very important, it is only a small part of the effort to encourage your customer to truly behave the way you would like. A meaningful offer can drive significant results. It doesn’t have to be monetary in nature, either. Here is an example of this that I read in a recent issue of Business Week magazine. Researchers at Britain’s Nottingham School of Economics worked with a large German wholesaler that sells goods on EBay, tracking the lukewarm or negative comments posted on the site by the company’s customers over six months. They then responded to 632 complaints. Half of the e-mailed responses offered a brief apology. Half offered instead a “goodwill gesture” of a small cash rebate. All e-mails asked customers to remove the comments they had posted online. For those offered the rebate, it was a condition of receiving the cash. About 45% of customers receiving an apology withdrew their so-so or negative ratings, compared with 21% of those offered money to do so. To me this shows that a relevant human approach that recognizes their customers’ goodness can deliver a strong response.

So if you are looking to drive loyalty among your core customers, follow this simple formula (2RL + 2RC + RW = CL) and you’ll see some pretty strong results.

7 Comments »

  1. Zain: As usual, you cut through to the point and your equation is simple but right on target. Unfortunately, most retailers (and others) don’t spend enough time on the relevance part of the equation and therefore fail to differentiate themselves from their competitors. You may want to encourage them to put 3 parts relevance into the equation since there can never be enough whet the appetite of today’s discerning consumer.
    Ken Banks
    http://www.kenbanks.com

    Comment by Ken Banks — October 27, 2009 @ 2:30 pm | Reply

  2. Zain – great post. I agree completely. The ultimate goal of loyalty programs is to build loyalty, not just increase transactions. The reward is not nearly as important as relevance and recognition. As a loyal customer, I expect the brand to know me personally (or at least fake it well) and communicate with me as such. The importance of the data collected through loyalty programs is often overlooked. Not only can a brand increase loyalty through the behavioral aspect (joining the club, collecting points, etc.) but also an emotional aspect. Receiving relevant communications that acknowledge past purchases and/or personal preferences can mean the world to your best customers. This means they’re in for the long-haul. Not just the next purchase.

    Comment by AM — October 30, 2009 @ 9:20 am | Reply

  3. Great points, both. In addition to relevance, I continue to submit that recognition is also important. The consumer wants to be recognized for the contributions they make to the business. That, plus relevance will take you most of the way.

    Zain

    Comment by Zain Raj — October 30, 2009 @ 9:47 am | Reply

  4. Zain,
    You have started a great topic of discussion… and in a most simplistic paraphrase, it’s putting a smile on the transaction… to treat the consumer with respect as a unique person, and not just as a transaction, or even worse, as just some spare change.

    Some specific reactions… we should be trying as an ideal, or as best as possible, to strive for “the Norm effect”. Can you make your brand as inviting as “Cheers”???, a place where you are well known, and “everybody knows your name”, This environment provides both relevance and recognition.

    More importantly, these two elements can be their own reward ….Your customers might not need frequent flyer points, or expensive reward programs. Getting comped occasionally by your bar tender might just do the trick…. Or even having a wave from the chef at your favorite restaurant.. each of these removes you from the herd, makes you feel special, and warrants your return business and support.
    Likewise, with service. It has been reported that that the most loyal customers are not the ones that have never experienced problems with you, but those few that have had their troubles taken care of quickly and painlessly.

    Lastly, traditional “reward” programs have the seeds of their own destruction built within them. Typically, they reward expenditures, or volume of some sort… so you get credits just for showing up. As these chits pile up, they change the dynamics of the relationship, simply because they can accrue real value (e.g. airline miles). They become the reason for the relationship.. not the brand, not the experience. Self-attribution theory has plenty to say about explaining the reasons for one’s behavior. And given a strong external explanation, it can become the dominant one . It doesn’t build a strong brand bond by helping your customers say “I did it for the miles, or the points, or the sweepstakes entry”. Better for your customers to say, “I did it because I like them”. And why might they feel that way??? Because they think that you like them too.

    Comment by Richard — October 30, 2009 @ 12:31 pm | Reply

  5. Very thoughtful, Richard. Some great points. Thanks.

    Zain

    Comment by Zain Raj — November 2, 2009 @ 8:40 pm | Reply

  6. Social Loyalty…

    Today’s customer is less likely to spend and more likely to be discerning when they do which has further widened the profitability gap between maintaining existing customers and acquiring a reluctant new one.  Traditional loyalty problems are a g…

    Trackback by Dew Point — November 16, 2009 @ 9:41 am | Reply

  7. [...] frequency has the potential to create loyalty – you have to use the simple equation (2RL+2RC+RW=CL) – but execute consistently over time.  It also assumes that your category has the level of [...]

    Pingback by Frequency vs. Loyalty: What’s the right answer? « Behavior First — November 16, 2009 @ 1:59 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a comment

Blog at WordPress.com.