Frequency or Loyalty? What should it be?

I had a spirited debate with a senior marketing person recently over lunch. A debate that almost involved us chucking salad at each other. Ironically, this person, who I agreed would not be named in any of my writings is a very good friend.

What was this debate about? What could get two fairly relaxed professionals excited enough that they would consider having a food fight at a respectable Italian restaurant?

A simple question. Is a loyalty program needed?

There is a belief that loyalty programs are critical in today’s undifferentiated marketing environment. That without some way of rewarding customers continuously, they will defect. U.S. Cellular just launched the Belief Project, a loyalty program, where they give their customers points for their regular behavior with the brand. Pay your bills and earn points.  Change your phone and earn points.

Is this loyalty? I beg to disagree.

This is frequency marketing, where marketers provide their customers with incentives for the behavior they seek. Nothing wrong with this. In most cases a smarter marketing approach than developing an expensive loyalty program.

Jos. A Bank Clothiers proves this model. They use frequency marketing principles overlaid with a high-low promotional approach to continue growing their business, even in this challenging economic environment. What also makes this work for them is that Jos. A Bank has good quality products, good assortment and good customer service. All, at convenient locations.

Most customers do not behave loyally in many categories. As I wrote in one of my earlier blogs, a high number of “loyal customers” are suffering from the Stockholm Syndrome. They seem loyal, but in effect are held hostage by the brand.

So, what most marketers call loyalty, is nothing but consistent frequency from their customers. If you come regularly and buy frequently, then by the current paradigm, you are considered to be a loyal customer.

Are you? Really?

Just because you use/buy the same product regularly, doesn’t necessarily mean that you have deep emotional feelings about it. All it means is that the product is fulfilling its promise consistently and therefore you, the customer continue to use it. The day it doesn’t, is the day you will look for an alternative.

My advise to marketers, in most categories, is to not get seduced by the whole idea of a loyalty program. If all you need is more frequent visits from your customers, execute a simple frequency marketing program.

It is easier, cheaper and will deliver positive ROI very quickly.

Now, if you have similar lunch partners, this belief may result in some lettuce with vinaigrette on your shirt.

Advertisements


Categories: about me, Analytics, Blogroll, brand strategy, consumer behavior, crm, database, emotive, future, loyalty, marketing, measurable, retail, segmentation

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

1 reply

  1. Well said. However, the basis of all relationships is an increase in number of transactions. That is the foundation. Once you get this, then the brand needs to aspire for a deeper set of emotive relationships.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: